| Vulnerable Parameter |
Original Value |
Method |
| id |
3 |
GET |
| Attack Type |
Attack Value |
Error |
| SQL Repeat |
REPEAT(0x33,2) |
The following parameter values were submitted to test for this vulnerability: #1, Passed: REPEAT(0x33,2) - the response should be different from the original. Alternate value. #2, Passed: REPEAT(0x33,1) - the response should be the same as the original. #3, Passed: REPEAT(0x33,2) - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value. #4, Passed: REPEAT(0x33,1) - the response should be the same as the original. #5, Passed: REPEAT(0x33,2) - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value.
Vulnerable areas in the responses are not highlighted: Binary Response |
|
 |
| Original Traffic |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #1 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #2 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #3 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #4 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #5 |
 |
|
|
| Modulo Equivalence |
MOD(9,7) |
The following parameter values were submitted to test for this vulnerability: #1, Passed: 2 - the response should be different from the original. Alternate value. #2, Passed: MOD(7,4) - the response should be the same as the original. #3, Passed: MOD(7,5) - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value. #4, Passed: MOD(11,4) - the response should be the same as the original. #5, Passed: MOD(9,7) - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value.
Vulnerable areas in the responses are not highlighted: Binary Response |
|
 |
| Original Traffic |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #1 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #2 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #3 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #4 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #5 |
 |
|
|
| Subtractive Equivalence |
4-2 |
The following parameter values were submitted to test for this vulnerability: #1, Passed: 2 - the response should be different from the original. Alternate value. #2, Passed: 4-1 - the response should be the same as the original. #3, Passed: 3-1 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value. #4, Passed: 5-2 - the response should be the same as the original. #5, Passed: 4-2 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value.
Vulnerable areas in the responses are not highlighted: Binary Response |
|
 |
| Original Traffic |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #1 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #2 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #3 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #4 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #5 |
 |
|
|
| Logical Or |
3%20OR%203=3 |
The following parameter values were submitted to test for this vulnerability: #1, Passed: 3 OR 1=1 - the response should be different from the original. Alternate value. #2, Passed: 3 OR 1=0 - the response should be the same as the original. #3, Passed: 3 OR 2=2 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value. #4, Passed: 3 OR 2=1 - the response should be the same as the original. #5, Passed: 3 OR 3=3 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value.
Vulnerable areas in the responses are not highlighted: Binary Response |
|
 |
| Original Traffic |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #1 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #2 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #3 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #4 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #5 |
 |
|
|
| SQL Coalesce |
COALESCE(NULL,NULL,0x71) |
The following parameter values were submitted to test for this vulnerability: #1, Passed: COALESCE(0x71,NULL,0x33) - the response should be different from the original. #2, Passed: COALESCE(NULL,NULL,0x33) - the response should be the same as the original. #3, Passed: COALESCE(NULL,0x71,0x33) - the response should be different from the original. #4, Passed: COALESCE(NULL,0x33,0x71) - the response should be the same as the original. #5, Passed: COALESCE(NULL,NULL,0x71) - the response should be different from the original.
Vulnerable areas in the responses are not highlighted: Binary Response |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Parameters |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| id |
COALESCE(NULL,NULL,0x71) |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Original Traffic |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #1 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #2 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #3 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #4 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #5 |
 |
|
|
| Additive Equivalence |
0%2b2 |
The following parameter values were submitted to test for this vulnerability: #1, Passed: 2 - the response should be different from the original. Alternate value. #2, Passed: 2+1 - the response should be the same as the original. #3, Passed: 1+1 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value. #4, Passed: 0+3 - the response should be the same as the original. #5, Passed: 0+2 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value.
Vulnerable areas in the responses are not highlighted: Binary Response |
|
 |
| Original Traffic |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #1 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #2 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #3 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #4 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #5 |
 |
|
|
| Logical Equivalence |
3%20AND%202=3 |
The following parameter values were submitted to test for this vulnerability: #1, Passed: 3 AND 1=0 - the response should be different from the original. Alternate value. #2, Passed: 3 AND 1=1 - the response should be the same as the original. #3, Passed: 3 AND 1=2 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value. #4, Passed: 3 AND 2=2 - the response should be the same as the original. #5, Passed: 3 AND 2=3 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value.
Vulnerable areas in the responses are not highlighted: Binary Response |
|
 |
| Original Traffic |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #1 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #2 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #3 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #4 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #5 |
 |
|
|
| Modulo Equivalence |
9%20%%207 |
The following parameter values were submitted to test for this vulnerability: #1, Passed: 2 - the response should be different from the original. Alternate value. #2, Passed: 7 % 4 - the response should be the same as the original. #3, Passed: 7 % 5 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value. #4, Passed: 11 % 4 - the response should be the same as the original. #5, Passed: 9 % 7 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value.
Vulnerable areas in the responses are not highlighted: Binary Response |
|
 |
| Original Traffic |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #1 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #2 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #3 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #4 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #5 |
 |
|
|
| Modulo Equivalence |
9%20MOD%207 |
The following parameter values were submitted to test for this vulnerability: #1, Passed: 2 - the response should be different from the original. Alternate value. #2, Passed: 7 MOD 4 - the response should be the same as the original. #3, Passed: 7 MOD 5 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value. #4, Passed: 11 MOD 4 - the response should be the same as the original. #5, Passed: 9 MOD 7 - the response should be the same as the response from the Alternate value.
Vulnerable areas in the responses are not highlighted: Binary Response |
|
 |
| Original Traffic |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #1 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #2 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #3 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #4 |
 |
|
|
| Attack Traffic #5 |
 |
|
|
|